Publications prior to 2020

  • Carpanen D, Kedgley AE, Shah DS, Edwards DS, Plant DJ & Masouros SD. (2019). Injury risk of interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints under impact loading. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 97, 306–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.037

  • Ding Z, Tsang CK, Nolte D, Kedgley AE, & Bull AMJB. (2019) Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 66(12), 3444–3456. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2905956

  • Kedgley AE, Saw T, Segal NA, Hansen UN, Bull AMJ, Masouros SD. (2019) Predicting meniscal tear stability across knee-joint flexion using finite-element analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 206–214. doi: 0.1007/s00167-018-5090-4

  • Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. (2018) Alterations to wrist tendon forces following flexor carpi radialis or ulnaris sacrifice: a cadaveric simulator study, Journal of Hand Surgery (European) 43: 886-888. doi: 10.1177/1753193418783176

  • Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. (2018) The importance of abductor pollicis longus in wrist motions: A physiological wrist simulator study, Journal of Biomechanics 77: 218-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.011

  • Vardakastani V, Bell H, Mee S, Brigstocke G, Kedgley AE. (2018) Clinical measurement of the dart throwing motion of the wrist: variability, accuracy and correction, Journal of Hand Surgery (European) 43: 723-731. doi: 10.1177/1753193418773329

  • Garland AK, Shah DS, Kedgley AE. (2018) Wrist tendon moment arms: Quantification by imaging and experimental techniques, Journal of Biomechanics 68: 136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.024

  • Goislard De Monsabert B, Edwards D, Shah DS, Kedgley AE. (2018) Importance of consistent datasets in musculoskeletal modelling: A study of the hand and wrist, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 46: 71–85. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1936-z

  • Taylor SAF, Kedgley AE, Humphries A, Shaheen AF. (2018) Simulated activities of daily living do not replicate functional upper limb movement or reduce movement variability, Journal of Biomechanics 76: 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.040

  • Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. (2017) The effects of wrist motion and hand orientation on muscle forces: A physiologic wrist simulator study, Journal of Biomechanics 60: 232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.017

  • Shah DS, Kedgley AE. (2016) Control of a wrist joint motion simulator: A phantom study, Journal of Biomechanics 49: 3061-3068. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.001

  • Amabile C, Bull AMJ, Kedgley AE. (2016) The centre of rotation of the shoulder complex and the effect of normalisation, Journal of Biomechanics 49: 1938-1943. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.035

click on images to enlarge

Goniometry measurements. At the start of the motion: (a) extension, (b) DTM and (c) radial deviation angle. At the end of the motion: (d) flexion, (e) DTM and (f) ulnar deviation angle. For measurements of the DTM angle, the arms of goniometer were a

Goniometry measurements. At the start of the motion: (a) extension, (b) DTM and (c) radial deviation angle. At the end of the motion: (d) flexion, (e) DTM and (f) ulnar deviation angle. For measurements of the DTM angle, the arms of goniometer were aligned with the dorsal side of the radius and the second metacarpal. For all other measurements, the goniometer was placed according to standard clinical practice.

A multivariate box-and-whisker plot of posterior radial displacement at the maximum load (Dmax, mm) at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of elbow flexion of the normal (control) elbow and after isolated Osborne-Cotterill lesion (OCL) and OCL +  lateral collateral

A multivariate box-and-whisker plot of posterior radial displacement at the maximum load (Dmax, mm) at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of elbow flexion of the normal (control) elbow and after isolated Osborne-Cotterill lesion (OCL) and OCL +  lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) resection (group 1). The horizontal line in the middle of each box indicates the median, the top and bottom borders of the box mark the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and the whiskers indicate the standard deviation.

The maximum, minimum and ranges of motion for the thoracic lateral flexion, axial rotation and forward flexion for the eat, wash, retrieve from shelf, comb and perineal care ADLs. Simulated tasks (STs) are shown in solid grey and functional tasks (FT

The maximum, minimum and ranges of motion for the thoracic lateral flexion, axial rotation and forward flexion for the eat, wash, retrieve from shelf, comb and perineal care ADLs. Simulated tasks (STs) are shown in solid grey and functional tasks (FTs) are shown in patterned grey, error bars represent ± one standard deviation of the means of maximum and minimum angles. * show significant differences in maximum/minimum angles and § show a significant difference in the range of motion.

Muscle forces (mean ± one standard deviation) in flexion–extension (FE-5030) with (dashed) and without (solid) the abductor pollicis longus (APL) for flexor carpi radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU).

Muscle forces (mean ± one standard deviation) in flexion–extension (FE-5030) with (dashed) and without (solid) the abductor pollicis longus (APL) for flexor carpi radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU). The asterisk (*) indicates statistically significant differences between the two groups (significance: p < 0.05).